There is only one letter...

between hope and hype;
Why.

[1-23-10 retro - fight.]
[1-24-10 Start Thinking, Right: after that, it is just; punctuation and gramma R.

[1-25-10: Air America(Chapter 7), too much competition, AM1090 still kicking, and the next kick is Free Speech for people.org!]
[1-26-10: or nuanced (for later)]

FOOTNOTE PAGE FOUR July 2013

7-9-13 *** (b.s.) "tuation" Case Study(s.c.), There is only one letter...(s.c.)  "slash" pun (4f) In "F"n able? , Give an inch, Take a mile.  (4f''n*)  Take Back the American Dream(s.c.), WHERE DO YOU FALL...OWS!(s.c.) [Not exactly  / free association !]
7-30-13 [FP3]  Not to pun on quitter, but to finally read.
7-31-13 Actually to pun on Sounders !(a,b) 3. balanced + solutions (b, e, f, g, h, i) 4. P E G (b,c,d,e of G) 5. FulCrum (A*, b, C, D of E) 6. FC (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h,, i, j, l)

* anachronism of U.S.C. 

Leveling the World Stage?

And restoring some floors @ the U.N. 
Ultimately it is not about [No Bama O Drama.] (*) 
[David Gregory "he wants the debate".]

(*) NBOD coined 8-30-13 as QCON(re-links)
[Quick Comment on News, or might be QuipCON?]
[Foibles of punctuation and excuse m-beds.]
(Spoiler alert: Try Lemmings, Kidding Goats, and  Votes)

9-2-13 
Proposed resolution to congress.

9-3-13
Congress World Reaction(ABC)

It is not just about Obama's "Red Line", it is about the world having Red Lines or not.  It is truly about the use of WMD, as well as a nation that is falling apart (Syrian civil war) needing to have an urgency of the negotiating table. 

Alternatively or simultaneously, Syria's partners on the U.N. Security council as well as other opposition partners (Arab League, Pakistan, Iran,)should have a stake in getting things to the table or world court.

[Pre-Post-Or-US ?  The Leverage of NOW**?]

** anachronism of opinion (by Ghosh)
(*)segue[be-date?/timing]
[9-4-13 inserted NOW link]

9-27-13 M-bedded in the FP (freak n' pounding) i.e. capitol ization of font. Note situation of September's FP and their headings. And the 5th of sorts. / A. Inconvenient , B. , C. The Real B. S. of the F. C. , D. Nail Meet F--C---[!] , E. Irony versus Hypocrisy [!]

Case Study

Headlines under question(marks)!
Some filter so other don't have to?
Please read, as I haven't yet.

CAUTION: Sarcasm warning! Or as "some people" might say "nuance"? Or was that missed metaphors* or hypocrisy or as I noted "equivalence"** as a challenge in this revolving rhetorical not revolutionary world?

* more likely sloppy punctuation, or logic and grammar?
SUBSET OF CAUTION: I make no equivalence, Google found these Trivium, and the punc is likely too heavy metal or irony?

** just posted "saved in draft"

[There are deeper and lighter case studies, but they are under investigation if not pending prosecution.]

[No Teaser but Prophetic? But dig that Newsweek "V" of triumvirates, the deck of emergence is at least missing the "mark"(?) as in Rand(y) Childish Partiers. I used to be overly sceptical(and ahead of the curve) in the area of Mainstream Media, especially more so in print(I won't mention the big 3) but their first initials are N,T & U or is it nuts? But they are just playing to the market yet the fair-E tale is always in the making. All on deck, even if you have a couple(decks) or are missing a few cards, they just might be only the jokers.]

Them and Us[!]

Is there? **
Who dat ? *

*not to pun(k)***
** pre-M-bed
[original in-tent ?]
***[tuation]


7-10-13 need to review Footnote Pages  [ ***(FP4)] *

(7-10-13) Two Points [!]   (reformatted)

Physiks? (FP1)  i.e. If businesses are persons, we need equal representation and taxation under the law.  That might imply that a flat tax(or flatter tax) might work if there were basic tax exemptions applied equally and without targeting.  (potential FP to sort)(FP2) The catch is the will of the reformers. (Or avoiding the Tax Reform Trap.) (There may also be a democracy trap [!])

*Re: Cycle asterisks (FP!)